The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 21:37, 20 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Rakhwala (1971 film)[edit]

Rakhwala (1971 film) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I can only find 1 Critical Review (The Hindu), but WP:NFILM requires 2 reviews. I couldn't find any others in a WP:BEFORE Donaldd23 (talk) 18:26, 6 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Donaldd23 (talk) 18:26, 6 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Donaldd23 (talk) 18:26, 6 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Just as well it has two reviews then. :-) † Encyclopædius 06:47, 7 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment, the "review" you added is a passing mention about a song in the film, not really a review that would establish notability per WP:NFILM. Donaldd23 (talk) 11:54, 7 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment, but I can see it being applied to WP:GNG and making it pass that way. Let's see if other editor's agree. Thanks! Donaldd23 (talk) 12:07, 7 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep reviews there, and the film is definitely notable. Shahid • ^Talk2me 09:27, 15 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep: Two non-trivial articles are good enough to keep the film under WP:NFO. -- Ab207 (talk) 05:54, 16 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.