The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete without prejudice to anyone creating a redirect at this title, as long as there is a suitable target. Hut 8.5 20:39, 31 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Rawat Public School, Pratap Nagar, Jaipur[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG.Written by a WP:COI editor.At minimum could be redirected to Jaipur.Zero mention in WP:RS. Winged Blades^Godric 16:49, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No RS, clear COI, fails notability criteria on all levels, the photo of school is not a photo, but a painting of building plan. —usernamekiran(talk) 17:40, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I can't find any reliable references to this school. Power~enwiki (talk) 18:21, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete If no independent source can be found, then it fails WP:verifiabilty whatever our usual practice of keeping articles about high schools. If independent refs are found I would reconsider. Edison (talk) 18:58, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 21:00, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 21:00, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 21:00, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment:https://rpspn.educationstack.com seems to be a secondary source.FORCE RADICAL⭐^⭮@ 10:27, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Forceradical:--rpspn stands for the name of the school.And educationstack.com is domain name.How does it appar to be a sec. source esp. given the contents of the website?It is the school website!Winged Blades^Godric 10:31, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Don't get worked up- I may have confused it with another reputable website with a similar name.SorryFORCE RADICAL⭐^⭮@ 10:34, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Winged Blades of Godric and Forceradical: it is not school's website. rpspn is subdomain. Not sure if it can be edited by the school or not though. From the looks of it, i would say its a paid review. —usernamekiran(talk) 10:39, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Usernamekiran::--I have my doubt.But whatever the heck that is, it obviuoly isn't a WP:RS!Winged Blades^Godric 10:41, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Some tangential discussion
HeyWinged Blades of Godric You seem to be extremely worked up about a small issue.Calm down!!Truncated message per oversight policyFORCE RADICAL⭐^⭮@ 11:14, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply] Comment:@Winged Blades of Godric and Forceradical: All of us are here in goodfaith, to contribute to wikipedia. We shouldnt fight among ourself. Yes, WB Godric seems a little worked up today. Maybe you should take a wiki-break for a few hours. Getting freshened up with wikibreaks is sort necessary for everybody. —usernamekiran(talk) 11:15, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply] (edit conflict)@Forceradical:Chill down!No body is worked up!And in case you don't know, redirect-wars are resolved in AFDs.Also, pings don't work, unless signed.Winged Blades^Godric 11:18, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Some tangential discussion

HeyWinged Blades of Godric You seem to be extremely worked up about a small issue.Calm down!!Truncated message per oversight policyFORCE RADICAL⭐^⭮@ 11:14, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment:@Winged Blades of Godric and Forceradical: All of us are here in goodfaith, to contribute to wikipedia. We shouldnt fight among ourself. Yes, WB Godric seems a little worked up today. Maybe you should take a wiki-break for a few hours. Getting freshened up with wikibreaks is sort necessary for everybody. —usernamekiran(talk) 11:15, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

(edit conflict)@Forceradical:Chill down!No body is worked up!And in case you don't know, redirect-wars are resolved in AFDs.Also, pings don't work, unless signed.Winged Blades^Godric 11:18, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment : Shouldn't WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES apply here? Coderzombie (talk) 14:31, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect as per standing procedure for nn schools. Whatever OUTCOMES says, nominator and other deletionists PLEASE NOTE that 'redirect' rather than 'deletion' is an official Wikipedia Policy. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 03:38, 28 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I can't read this except through Google translate, but these results seem to suggest that the school has a reputation for excellence in the area and has enough community events [1] [2] to expect wider coverage. These are of course only the results that I as an English-speaker with zero knowledge of Hindi was able to find without searching through local papers. @Winged Blades of Godric and Kudpung: I'd be interested to see both of your assessments. TonyBallioni (talk) 00:41, 31 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@TonyBallioni:--Sorry, I have strong doubts whether the source pass WP:RS.The writing seems promotional and may be paid.Winged Blades^Godric 07:05, 31 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.