The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to PureNRG. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 22:43, 6 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

ReNRGized[edit]

ReNRGized (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Completing nomination for 98.248.33.198 (talk · contribs), reason given was: PROD removed by creator without improvement. Still fails to meet the criteria for music albums. Note that the article has already been deleted three times for failure to meet criteria. Procedural nomination, I am neutral at the moment. Tim Song (talk) 22:55, 29 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per WP:NALBUMS - "All articles on albums, singles or songs must meet the basic criteria at the notability guidelines, with significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject." - DustFormsWords (talk) 02:14, 30 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete or redirect to pureNRG per WP:NALBUMS. Victão Lopes ^{I hear you...} 20:05, 3 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.