The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 09:32, 11 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Recovering Yogi[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable and defunct; According to the website, "For now, we’ve decided to pause Recovering Yogi." —Cpt.a.haddock (talk) (please ping when replying) 12:55, 2 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 14:51, 2 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 14:51, 2 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Agree with above concerning notability. The founders section reads very close to the line of promotional for me. LikeMeercats (talk) 18:11, 2 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Not notable. No third-party coverage. I don't think that being defunct is a big problem, but I don't think this will be notable in the future either. wumbolo ^^^ 21:46, 9 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.