The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Red Wing, Minnesota. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 00:21, 18 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Red Wing Public Library[edit]

Red Wing Public Library (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

I can only find trivial mentions for this library. Fails WP:CORP. Iowateen (talk) 01:31, 11 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Smerge to Red Wing, Minnesota. Who then was a gentleman? (talk) 04:24, 11 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge I agree with nominator, I only find trivial mentions (i.e. events held at the library, people associated with it). And there's not much to the current site. But the library's website itself, [1], being a noncontroversial government site, is a perfectly usableable reliable source to include a small amount of text on the library on the page on Red Wing, Minnesota, per Who then was a gentleman?'s suggestion. There's even a bit of history up there: [2]. Also as a comment, I think it's generally not good to put things like hours up, because those can change and then we are duplicating the main website--but things that don't change, like history, are fair game (and are much more encyclopedic!). Cazort (talk) 17:26, 11 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Re-direct and merge to Red Wing, Minnesota. Niteshift36 (talk) 19:08, 11 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Minnesota-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 03:06, 12 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.