The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete, sock notwithstanding. Sandstein 20:22, 5 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

RedneckHippie[edit]

RedneckHippie (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
File:Redhp2.jpg (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) (added by closing admin)

This has a strong whiff of hoax page but not quite enough; a strong whiff of an attack page but not quite enough; a strong whiff of a dicdef but not quite enough; a strong whiff of something made up in school one day but not enough. With that many not-quite-enough's, bringing it here — for all I know, this is a genuine subculture (it does appear to have its own website), and I don't know enough about California to judge iridescenti (talk to me!) 15:45, 29 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Please Don't Delete Hi, Thanks for your comments. I would agree that this word is not in common usage. However this word is used in northern California. I have heard it on the Radio many times. I hope that the word can be kept and hopefully the entry will be developed more. Thanks Ty Tyrobincollins 15:55, 2 May 2007 (UTC)— Tyrobincollins (talkcontribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]


Please Don't Delete I've heard this word and would like to see the description developed. -J, Arcata, California Arcataj 03:47, 1 May 2007 (UTC)— Arcataj (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.