The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:59, 18 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reede-drum[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Ummm.... hoax? Certainly the popularity part.... Vrac (talk) 21:27, 10 July 2015 (UTC) (And maybe archive to: Wikipedia:List of hoaxes on Wikipedia, 7 years 7 months is a pretty good run...)Vrac (talk) 18:14, 12 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:52, 10 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Kyrgyzstan-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:52, 10 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Looks very much like a hoax to me. No sources. Created by a single-purpose account that has never done anything since. Unfortunately it's been here for so long that lots of other websites have copied it, so Google shows a fair number of results, but I can't find any that seem reliable. The image is actually of a drum from Mindanao and seems to have been copied from here, without the owner's permission according to his Pinterest site, so the image should be deleted as a copyvio too. --Deskford (talk) 00:28, 11 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete fails WP:V. I've tried looking for sources on Kyrgyz percussion instruments but nothing comes up under that name, and none of which are frame drums. If the scale is correct, the image clearly doesn't match the description. Unsourced mentions of kangaroo skin, The Clancy Brothers (Irish folk band) and American college curricula also seem out of place. Fuebaey (talk) 05:44, 11 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. No refs provided and none to be found, other than those that originate from this article. Apparent hoax. --Hobbes Goodyear (talk) 17:38, 12 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.