The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The promised citations do not appear to have materialized. T. Canens (talk) 00:21, 3 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Regulatory oracle[edit]

Regulatory oracle (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet the GNG. Can't find significant coverage in independent sources. Is simply a phrase coined by one author of a couple of papers on blockchains. Can't find it mentioned elsewhere online or in any article on Wikipedia. Kb.au (talk) 02:51, 19 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Kb.au (talk) 02:54, 19 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Kb.au (talk) 02:54, 19 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. Kb.au (talk) 02:54, 19 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Kb.au (talk) 02:58, 19 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 09:32, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.