The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 07:13, 15 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Reply Magazine[edit]

Reply Magazine (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Went through the first 5 pages of google search, it has one dig, but besides that nothing. It looks like a professional site, but its 1rst article is Jan, 2010, so it might need awhile for someone to cover it. Pirate^Argh!!1! 07:19, 6 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

---

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Timotheus Canens (talk) 01:54, 13 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: I can't find significant coverage for this website. Joe Chill (talk) 02:53, 13 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. -- Timotheus Canens (talk) 06:04, 13 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, non-notable brand-new online magazine. Try again later--  Glenfarclas  (talk) 09:05, 13 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.