The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Beeblebrox (talk) 00:41, 28 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Resaas[edit]

Resaas (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This company doesn't appear to pass WP:CORP. There doesn't seem to be any in-depth third-party coverage of this company at all, not even in Canadian business magazines or newspapers available through my library's website. Google searches reveal press releases and the odd stock quote from Bloomberg et al, but nothing more substantive. NellieBly (talk) 02:08, 20 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 20:52, 20 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Speedy delete. This stub doesn't give us much of a clue as to what this business makes or does, though the presence of the string 'saas' in the business name is gravely suspect. No context to identify the subject, and hardly any content makes for no claim of minimal importance. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 23:49, 20 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment The statement that the company is publicly traded (and it is, on a national stock exchange) was in my opinion an assertion of significance that made it inappropriate for CSD. The company does exist and the name is wholly legitimate - there is no need for grave suspicion with respect to the string "saas" in this case (and why would there be otherwise?) This real estate support corporation simply doesn't appear to pass WP:CORP, hence its nomination here. --NellieBlyMobile (talk) 00:51, 21 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.