The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Swarm ♠ 20:34, 8 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Rescue![edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Topic lacks significant coverage from reliable, independent sources. (?) It had no meaningful hits in a video game reliable sources custom Google search. There are no worthwhile merge/redirect targets. Please ((ping)) me you find more (non-English and offline) sources. – czar 22:26, 2 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game-related deletion discussions. (G·N·B·S·RS·Talk) • Gene93k (talk) 23:10, 2 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:11, 2 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. After searching, I was unable to locate sources that demonstrate notability; fails WP:GNG. APerson (talk!) 23:21, 2 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Software (game) article of unclear notability, lacking independent refs. A search turned up forum posts and incidental mentions, but no significant RS coverage of this 1990s shareware game.Dialectric (talk) 11:54, 8 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.