The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete, consensus is that the article fails the notability guidelines. Davewild (talk) 20:36, 25 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Retro Horror Remix[edit]

Retro Horror Remix (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Article was listed for speedy as a db-band (incorrectly) and author contested. However article does not appear to meet the notability guidelines and is probably nothing more than an advertising page. --VS ^talk 11:56, 17 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as unsourced and non-notable. -- JediLofty ^{User ¦ Talk} 13:50, 17 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 17:35, 17 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as unsourced and non-notable. Sounds like a criminal hobby group, not encylopedic, unless they start breaking better laws.Yobmod (talk) 15:54, 24 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.