The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Singularity 05:28, 24 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Retsami[edit]

Retsami (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

Self-published game with no claim of meeting WP:Notability in article. First several pages of non-wiki ghits are game's own site and lots of forums -- I can't find sources showing notability. Contested prod. Fabrictramp (talk) 00:49, 19 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Appears to be a new, and not yet notable, board game. Article can be recreated at a later date if it catches on. --NickPenguin_(contribs) 00:59, 19 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete No evidence of notability presented in the article, unable to find any in google/yahoo results. --Snigbrook ^(talk) 01:21, 19 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as lacking third-party sources.--h i s ^{s p a c e} _{r e s e a r c h} 16:12, 19 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Game-related deletions. --Gavin Collins (talk) 22:52, 19 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete This game is only notable (as far as I can tell) for the raw amount of spam it has created (try a google search). Hobit (talk) 04:36, 21 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.