The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. KTC (talk) 00:12, 4 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Reuben Langdon[edit]

Reuben Langdon (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsourced BLP ineligible for BLP PROD. Seems to fail notability guidelines as well. Fbifriday (talk) 04:36, 24 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game-related deletion discussions. (G·N·B·S·RS·Talk) • Gene93k (talk) 19:04, 24 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:04, 24 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:04, 24 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete I don't see that he meets any notability guidelines and he doesn't seem to have significant independent coverage.Mdtemp (talk) 14:28, 25 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete He lacks the coverage to meet WP:GNG and doesn't seem to meet WP:MANOTE or any other notability criteria. Papaursa (talk) 01:29, 3 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.