The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 13:34, 5 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Revolution Truth[edit]

Revolution Truth (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The page has had notability issues since 2011, and has no citations except for releasing a teaser video in 2011. Softlemonades (talk) 11:59, 29 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 12:08, 29 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. The only thing I could find was a passing mention in Rolling Stone from 2014: https://www.rollingstone.com/culture/culture-news/the-wikileaks-mole-102787/ Just trivial coverage. Chagropango (talk) 15:37, 29 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, fails WP:N due to a lack of sustained coverage. Devonian Wombat (talk) 23:21, 4 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.