The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Xclamation point 01:43, 7 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Rezurex[edit]

Rezurex (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Fails the standards in WP:MUSIC. Has album released, but not two albums on a major record label, and so forth. DreamGuy (talk) 15:09, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep - meets minimum criteria for WP:MUSIC. Esasus (talk) 20:23, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you honestly think so, then please explain HOW it meets the criteria for WP:MUSIC. There does not seem to be any that apply, and indeed it explicitly fails all of them. DreamGuy (talk) 21:18, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as it doesn't currently meet criteria. However, if there's one review maybe there's more. I encourage the expansion of references and might change my opinion to "Keep" if the article is improved. --Boston (talk) 00:35, 3 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: insufficient 3rd party coverage WP:BAND. JamesBurns (talk) 02:35, 3 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete non notable. Jenuk1985 | Talk 14:40, 3 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.