- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Kurykh (talk) 00:20, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Rhian Brewster (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This footballer fails WP:NFOOTBALL as a player that has not played in any WP:FPL (fully proffessional league). Fbgpwns5277 (talk) 04:27, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 04:42, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 04:42, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 04:42, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone 09:29, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - fails WP:NFOOTBALL having never played in a fully professional league. Although there is some coverage in mostly local Liverpool based media, it seems to be standard stuff for a much hyped youth player which falls short of meeting WP:GNG. Kosack (talk) 09:55, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. GiantSnowman 10:34, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - seems to be a classic case of WP:TOOSOON, article can easily be re-created when subject of the article meets WP:NFOOTY and WP:GNG. Inter&anthro (talk) 01:25, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Fails NFOOTY as has not played or managed senior international football nor played or managed in a fully professional league. No indication that subject has garnered significant reliable coverage for any other achievements to satisfy GNG. Fenix down (talk) 09:02, 4 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.