The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ~ Amory (u • t • c) 16:02, 21 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ricardo Milos

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Briefly being the subject of a meme does not equal notability by Wikipedia standards. Google search for name brings up about 83 results, none of which discuss him in any significant way. Proposed deletion contested. ... discospinster _talk 03:00, 14 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Brazil-related deletion discussions. IntoThinAir (talk) 04:01, 14 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Dance-related deletion discussions. ~Ruyaba~ {talk} 04:59, 14 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. The article does not assert anything that adds up to notability. Sometimes people make articles for subjects which are not notable enough for an article but which are notable enough for a brief mention in an existing article, however I do not think that even that applies here. --DanielRigal (talk) 11:41, 14 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. WP:BIO1E applies, as well as WP:NBIO and WP:GNG. The two Russian sources are effectively blogs and are certainly not WP:RS. (One of them has an article in Russian WP - ru:TJ.) The English-language source says that the video has had over 100,000 views; to which I retort, So what? That's a trivial number.

FWIW, I would have ((prod-2))'ed the article. Narky Blert (talk) 13:23, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I'll just casually mention that beside being second top item on KnowYourMeme for several weeks now, this guy's name was apparently googled more often than topics such as quantum mechanics, nuclear weapons or distracted boyfriend meme (for which we have a prominent article which I actually tried to start an afd nom about which was quickly voted down) Source: https://trends.google.com/trends/explore?date=all&q=Ricardo%20Milos,Рикардо%20Милос,quantum%20mechanics,nuclear%20weapons,distracted%20boyfriend%20meme
I agree someone should try to improve the article though. Openlydialectic (talk) 17:28, 16 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:BLP1E; also seems borderline WP:PROMO. Jalen D. Folf (talk) 05:14, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Jalen D. Folf (talk) 05:16, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete PROMO for a non-notable performer.E.M.Gregory (talk) 14:44, 21 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.