The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 03:08, 7 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Richard Holcomb[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable individual, quick look could find no reliable sources other than the one source already given in the article, which arguably isn't a RS as to this individual. TRANSPORTERMAN (TALK) 20:12, 27 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - most hits involve a documentary about sex workers in Africa which he has been introducing in various venues. A search for "Project Weber" (thinking that perhaps his organization might be more notable and therefore a potential merge/redirect) turns up nothing notable either. Seaphoto^Talk 21:48, 27 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:35, 28 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:36, 28 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:06, 4 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete sources are not adequate. Chester Markel (talk) 01:25, 4 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.