The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. JForget 00:22, 6 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Richard K Weems[edit]

Richard K Weems (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Vague assertions of having written "numerous" short stories, which does not assert notability. Zero third party sources. It's been tagged for several issues since it was created over a month ago, and it has not improved in the slightest. I just sorted and categorized it, myself, albeit not so effectively. PROD was contested by the article creator, so I'm taking this to AfD. Enigma^msg 01:12, 30 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. -- –Juliancolton | ^Talk 01:45, 30 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: agree with the above. Patchy1Talk To Me! 02:07, 30 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. —David Eppstein (talk) 02:47, 30 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. He clearly doesn't pass WP:PROF, and I couldn't find any evidence of passing WP:CREATIVE or WP:BIO either. —David Eppstein (talk) 23:29, 1 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete in view of above findings. Xxanthippe (talk) 06:48, 3 August 2009 (UTC).[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.