The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 00:46, 26 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Richard Swann[edit]

Richard Swann (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Footballer who has not played at a fully professional level, which means he doesn't meet the WP:ATHLETE guideline. Nothing out of the ordinary to meet notability requirement. Jmorrison230582 (talk) 07:14, 19 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - fails WP:ATHLETE and WP:GNG by a country mile -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 08:42, 19 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - He's a non-notable player for a non-notable team. DitzyNizzy (aka Jess)|(talk to me)|(What I've done) 10:21, 19 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - per previous comments. He's non-notable under WP:ATHLETE and WP:GNG. Sir Sputnik (talk) 13:23, 19 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Athletes-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:44, 20 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:44, 20 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: clear failure of both WP:ATHLETE and more importantly WP:GNG. -- BigDom 07:37, 20 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete For an English footballer to fail WP:ATH is a genuine achievement. --Mkativerata (talk) 19:35, 20 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.