The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 13:03, 19 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

RickDate[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There only really seems to be one source for this, copied in many places. The source admits that the scheme is only used by himself and a couple of his programmer friends. Gigs (talk) 14:26, 4 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Delete, although I'd be willing to change my !vote if someone had some indication of widespread use. Weak mostly because it's an older article that's had a bit of work on it and some notes on the Talk Page, which goes some way to saying it's more than just one person using it. On the other hand, the talk page suggests it only has coverage because there's some really minor controversy over who first used it and why. ~Excesses~ (talk) 15:07, 4 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Per nom. This seems to be a non-notable application of Base 36 which is a well established technique. (See Base 36#Uses in practice.)--RDBury (talk) 05:02, 10 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JForget 23:53, 10 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NW (Talk) 22:28, 17 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. The one source mentioned by nom is part wiki part forum. -- Blanchardb -^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}- timed 01:46, 18 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Lacks widespread coverage, fails WP:GNG Chzz ► 21:57, 18 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.