The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 18:34, 16 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Riftforge[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:WEB and WP:V: non-notable browser game with no references based on reliable, third-party published sources. I've searched for reliable sources based on the WikiProject Video games guide to sources as well as the WPVG custom Google search and found nothing. Current references in the article are all self-published/primary. All others I could find are press releases, blogs, and forum posts, nothing that we can use to write an article. Wyatt Riot (talk) 12:06, 5 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletion discussions. (G·N·B·S·RS·Talk) Wyatt Riot (talk) 12:06, 5 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 02:13, 12 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Fails WP:GNG. Here's a press release [1], but that is considered primary. Other than that I don't see reliable secondary sources. — HELLKNOWZ ▎TALK 07:59, 14 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.