The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Jayjg (talk) 02:43, 28 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I can see lots of false positives in Google books and news but only perhaps 3 news articles that actually refer to RoadBike magazine. None of these is anything more than a passing mention, and none of them contain information about RoadBike magazine which we could cite in the article. --Dbratland (talk) 22:19, 20 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Weak delete, Dbratland sums up pretty much what I could find: a few passing mentions, enough to confirm that it exists, but mostly in the context of saying that so-and-so worked for RoadBike magazine, rather than any actual coverage of the magazine. As a note to the closing admin, Roadbike currently redirects to Road bicycle, but the author keeps changing it to point to RoadBike. In the event this article is kept, Roadbike should be a dab. Glenfarclas (talk) 02:07, 22 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.