The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
A small business, thirty years old and with ten employees. No other claims to notability. DJ Clayworth (talk) 13:34, 6 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
(Closing admin also please note a large number of redirects to this article). DJ Clayworth (talk) 13:38, 6 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete as blatant advertising. It was tagged as such on the 2nd of June and the article's author/primary contributor removed the tag. The same user also removed the nominator's AfD tag. I've warned user on their talkpage but, if there is an appropriate template someone may wish to employ it. Jasynnash2 (talk) 14:15, 6 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - I don't know about "blatant" advertising, as the article doesn't employ a lot of peacock terms. However, it is still an advert. TN‑X-Man 17:26, 6 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Not terribly spamalicious, but still advertising. We ain't a billboard. --Dennis The Tiger (Rawr and stuff) 17:29, 6 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - although not a speedy. Looks like this fails WP:CORP. I'm not seeing any reliable sources that can be used to either a)properly write this article or b) establish sufficient notability. Gwynand | Talk•Contribs 17:59, 6 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Sorta Speedy Delete, since it's not blatant advertising, but it's still pretty much so. ~DoubleAW[c] 00:54, 7 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.