The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy delete as spam. King of♥♦♣ ♠ 03:43, 8 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Contested prod; an anon has stated on the talk page that more work will be done on this article. No vote. M1ss1ontomars2k4 (talk) 21:01, 6 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
My current opinion is delete as advertising. If more sources come forth showing what makes this law firm notable, then I could be persuaded to change my mind. Corvus cornixtalk 22:30, 6 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.