The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Fenix down (talk) 19:57, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Roman Razdelkin[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article about semi-pro footballer who made a single appearance in a Russian Cup match between two clubs from fully-pro leagues. There is no online Russian-language coverage of Razdelkin except match reports and database entries (no SIGCOV). There is a longstanding consensus that a minimal amount of play in competitive matches between clubs from fully-pro leagues is not sufficient to satisfy WP:NFOOTBALL when WP:GNG is comprehensively failed - as it is here. This article has existed in the same abject state for nearly 11 years, and we have every reason to believe it will be a perma-stub if we forgo prior consensus and keep it. Jogurney (talk) 17:53, 24 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. ~ Amkgp 💬 18:04, 24 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. ~ Amkgp 💬 18:04, 24 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Russia-related deletion discussions. ~ Amkgp 💬 18:04, 24 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete a non-notable footballer.John Pack Lambert (talk) 18:38, 24 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Giant Snowman 13:07, 25 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom, fails GNG which is more important than scraping by on NFOOTBALL. Giant Snowman 13:11, 25 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.