The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Keep - well definitely not delete, and also most geographical towns are kept even if small, and the keep advocates presented a more cogent case I feel.Blnguyen | rant-line 01:32, 21 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Rosegaferro[edit]

Delete, article on a small fraction of an Italian municipality. The only information contained is the estimated number of inhabitants, I think that it could be merged in the article of its municipality: Villafranca di Verona. Dani 7C3 09:28, 14 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. There are plenty of other towns on Wikipedia with smaller populations than this. Should have scope for expansion. Stu ^{’Bout ye!} 09:58, 14 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• My default votes on towns, cities or villages is to keep as real places with communities of interest. However, there seems to be verifiabilty problems. I get 29 Google hits for this place with little verifiable information among the results. [1]. The top hits are Wikipedia and a mirror article on Answers.com and there is nothing else that verifies it. A search of various databases subscribed to my local public library came up with nothing. A search of Google Books does rather better but most of the hits are in Italian. [2] It seems to be mentioned in the list of Italian postcodes. For now, I vote to keep and I hope someone who speaks Italian can translate some of the sources and use it to expand the article. Keep and hopefully expand. Capitalistroadster 10:09, 14 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I speak Italian and I looked the book sources you find: a pair are list of postcodes, all the other books mention Rosegaferro because Regiments of the Austrian-Hungarian Army moved there during the Austro-Sardinian War in 1859.

I'm wondering if it's worth to keep a lot of minimal stub all of this kind: X is a fraction of the municipality of Y. Inhabitants are Z (esteem). Most of them in my opinion have no chance to be expanded. These kind of articles are linked only by the main article on their municipality. What does this article tell us more that couldn't be write in the municipality article? An estimated number of inhabitants? It could be easily put in a box in the main article.--Dani 7C3 11:38, 14 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Possible merge into area's main area, if this exists --Xyrael ^T 17:29, 14 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep (or merge). I've added a few factoids. Dlyons493 Talk 21:52, 14 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, it's still not notable on its own. Merge the population to its municipality. --Coredesat 01:07, 15 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.