The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 00:10, 9 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Rules of Tag Backs[edit]

Rules of Tag Backs (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

I can identify the subject of the article (I removed a CSD A1 tag), but is it really notable? Raymie Humbert (TrackerTV) (receiver, archives) 01:35, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Not notable, little context, and presents rules as if they were set and present for all cases when obviously not the case. I agree with deletion; maybe could be fit into Tag (game) somewhere, but finding good sources for even that is probably iffy. Jomasecu (talk) 01:45, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: Fails WP:N as there's no need for a separate article on an aspect of a children's game. Fraud ^{talk to me} 02:56, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Speedy Delete Wikipedia is not a how to guide. The rules of the game would certainly be welcome on the game of tag or tag back's article page, and I suspect they are already there.ChildofMidnight (talk) 20:32, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Per WP:OR and WP:NOTTEXTBOOK, fails notability guidelines. §hep • ¡Talk to me! 22:58, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.