The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Procedural close. Article has been moved to Draft:Ryan Goodfellow (footballer) and the resulting redirect deleted at 09:56 on 6 April 2016 by RHaworth (talk · contribs) (non-admin closure) | Uncle Milty | talk | 11:12, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ryan Goodfellow (footballer)[edit]

Ryan Goodfellow (footballer) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NFOOTY. SSTflyer 13:44, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. SSTflyer 13:45, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Scotland-related deletion discussions. SSTflyer 13:45, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ (talk) 13:45, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ (talk) 13:45, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ (talk) 13:45, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ (talk) 13:45, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

checkY Delete per WP:NFOOTY

Copy what you have so far to Draft:Ryan Goodfellow or User:Leegoodfellow/Ryan Goodfellow (you don't need the "(footballer)" part since there is no one else with that name), and you can work on it as long as you want. However, from your name it looks like you're his father or brother. If this is the case, you have a conflict of interest and shouldn't be writing the article at all. ubiquity (talk) 22:00, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.