The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Snow close. The result was delete‎. Bishonen | tålk 21:09, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ryan Tseko[edit]

Ryan Tseko (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG. The articles in Nigerian newspapers (Guardian, Telegraph, Vanguard, Sun) seem to be undisclosed paid articles, which appears to be a common practice in the country, see Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard#Nigerian_sources_on_paid_article. The Benzinga and Yahoo Finance references are the same article (the Yahoo article being a reprint of the Benzinga one). It doesn't look like a sponsored post, but opinions on the reliability of Benzinga seem mixed ([1]). The Bloomberg "Profile and Biography" is akin to a wikidata entry and contains almost no meaningful info, and doesn't count towards notability. AvBuyer is a marketplace for aircraft and not a source that would indicate notability. Hemiauchenia (talk) 23:47, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople, Aviation, and United States of America. Hemiauchenia (talk) 23:47, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: I'm calling BS on this. An American person, with apparently no connection to Africa or Nigeria, is extensively covered in Nigerian media. I mean he could very well be notable in America, but there is no coverage from this side of world about him. Oaktree b (talk) 00:23, 4 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment: This is about the only American coverage I can find, and it doesn't help notability [2]. This is fishy. Oaktree b (talk) 00:25, 4 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete The heavy reliance on the seemingly-paid sources makes this article reek of self-promotion, and the lack of secondary sources reinforces that. All of that is not to mention that the article is literally orange-tagged for paid contributions. The Kip 01:35, 4 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per all of the above. Left guide (talk) 02:01, 4 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete The sources appear to be undisclosed paid promotions. -- LCU ActivelyDisinterested «@» °∆t° 17:35, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: As per above and GNG. WeAreAllHere _talk 10:36, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Straight old-style puff piece article. Fails WP:SIGCOV, WP:BIO. scope_creep^Talk 12:32, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: Fails WP:GNG. Benicaverra (talk) 18:18, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.