The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:27, 21 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Not notable. Three references, one of which appears to be a book promotion. The others are essentially company organs. Essentially WP:SPAM, WP:PR for company. Student7 (talk) 00:48, 6 October 2010 (UTC) Student7 (talk) 00:48, 6 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep The article is notable for the fact that many racing drivers learnt there trade here including Lewis Hamilton.Northmetpit (talk) 08:17, 6 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I can only presume this nomination is a joke, yes? Easily notable per Northmetpit. Jeni(talk) 10:19, 6 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Wifione ....... Leave a message 20:58, 13 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: For one thing, I'm unaware of any valid ground for retention based on whether racing drivers patronized the establishment or not, and invite Northmetpit to post a link citing any ... what, is the local pub next to the track automatically notable because some drivers allegedly ate there? (I use "allegedly," by the bye, because Northmetpit proffers no evidence to back up his assertion that "many" racing drivers learned their trade there.) The only valid reference fails to mention the subject in "significant detail," as the GNG and other relevant policies and guidelines require. I agree that Mr. Hamilton is notable, but of course notability is not inherited. A search on Google UK returned a miniscule 68 hits [1], comprised of this article and various Wiki mirrors, and trivial references on other websites and blogs. Would anyone care to post references from reliable, independent, published sources discussing the subject in significant detail? Ravenswing 13:39, 14 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.