- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 00:51, 1 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- S. P. Singh (jurist) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No indication of notability. The references are either primary or just routine coverage. KSAWikipedian (talk) 02:31, 23 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 02:19, 30 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Vice-Chancellor (i.e. most senior academic) of Lucknow University. Mccapra (talk) 04:11, 30 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- WP:NACADEMIC requires that the person hold the highest elected or appointed post, wouldn't that have to be Chancellor rather than Vice-Chancellor? Chagropango (talk) 07:39, 30 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- no because the chancellor would be a titular appointment, e.g. Prince Charles, the President of India or some other worthy. Vice Chancellor is the senior academic and CEO of the university in UK-legacy systems. Mccapra (talk) 10:11, 30 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - in the British system which India follows, the vice-chancellor is actually head of the university. Chancellor is merely a figurehead. MaxnaCarta (talk) 12:54, 30 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.