The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete --Anthony.bradbury^"talk" 11:30, 22 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

SNES-Station[edit]

SNES-Station (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Software is absolutely non-notable (fails WP:N), and has no reliable sources (fails WP:RS). No matches in Google Books, article contains zero citations or references, and software appears to have been discontinued five years ago. Software appears to be nothing more than a port of SNES9x. There's no reason for WP to have articles on every port of SNES9x -- of which there are dozens. At best, maybe a footnote in the main SNES9x article would be appropriate, and that's pushing it.The muramasa (talk) 18:43, 16 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per failing WP:RS and WP:VIDEOGAME (i think that's the video game notability shortcut). Shapiros10 ^{contact me}_{My work} 19:30, 16 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete-as there is no verifiability (WP:V) of the system, and is non-notable (WP:NN) and seems like a hack someone created off of the original SNES9x port, and per failing WP:VG/GL.--SRX^--LatinoHeat 19:33, 16 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 16:27, 17 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.