The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Poorly sourced BLP. Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:04, 30 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Saba Wahid

[edit]
Saba Wahid (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested prod. Article about a TV presenter on a lifestyle show who is claimed to be a household name and a media trendsetter. No evidence that the show itself is notable, and anyway notability is not inherited. But more importantly the only references are a brief mention in a glossy magazine (which does not refer to her as a media trendsetter) and an even briefer entry in IMDB. Fails WP:ENTERTAINER, WP:RS and WP:GNG. andy (talk) 23:03, 15 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Middle East-related deletion discussions. Thryduulf (talk) 03:17, 16 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Thryduulf (talk) 03:17, 16 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:02, 17 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Logan Talk Contributions 00:17, 23 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.