The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep, nomination withdrawn and no !votes to delete. XOR'easter (talk) 19:08, 22 September 2020 (UTC) (non-admin closure)[reply]

Sabine Schindler[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

~~Non-notable academic~~ PepperBeast (talk) 00:36, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Withdrawing this nomination. PepperBeast (talk) 17:03, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. Lightburst (talk) 00:59, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Astronomy-related deletion discussions. Lightburst (talk) 00:59, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Lightburst (talk) 00:59, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Schindler became a corresponding member of the Austrian Academy of Sciences in 2006,[1] and has been a full member since 2010.[1][3] She was elected to the International Academy of Astronautics in 2013. sounds an awful lot like WP:NACADEMIC#C3 to me. --JBL (talk) 01:33, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Keep membership in Austrian Academy of Sciences clearly meets WP:NACADEMIC#C3. HouseOfChange (talk) 02:00, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as creator of this brand-new article. Passing a single criterion of WP:PROF is enough for notability, but when I create new biographical articles on academics I prefer to choose subjects who pass more than one, to protect against overzealous deletionists. In this case she passes three: #C3 (twice over) as member of a national academy and society fellow, as described above, #C1 for well-cited publications (seven listed in Google Scholar with over 100 citations each; searching for her name actually finds eight 100+-citation papers but I think one of them is not hers), and #C6 as rector of a notable institution of higher education. —David Eppstein (talk) 04:07, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. —David Eppstein (talk) 04:55, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Snow keep, per David Eppstein. Passes WP:PROF on multiple grounds. The nominator would be well advised to quickly withdraw this nomination. Nsk92 (talk) 05:16, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Happy to be wrong, but I'm not sure there is a way to unilaterally withdraw. PepperBeast (talk) 15:30, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, sure, there is, since there have been no 'delete' !votes so far. You could append a comment about withdrawing the nomination below your nominating statement above. After that any other editoir can close the AfD as 'speedy keep'. The process is standard and is explained in WP:CSK and WP:WITHDRAWN. Nsk92 (talk) 15:47, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Done! Thanks v. much for the info. PepperBeast (talk) 17:03, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Snow Keep Her university Curriculum Vitae states she is a full professor. Clearly notable. scope_creep^Talk 11:31, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- To clarify, full professor isn't sufficient, but she is clearly notable. -Kj cheetham (talk) 11:53, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy keep under WP:CSK #3, nominator doesn't seem to have done checked as per WP:BEFORE to see if passes WP:NPROF. -Kj cheetham (talk) 11:53, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, a demonstrably notable academic. Chiswick Chap (talk) 13:42, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, easily passing PROF just on citations and possibly other criteria as well.--Eostrix (^{🦉 hoot} _hoot🦉) 16:43, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.