The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Joyous! | Talk 00:40, 25 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

SafeFlame[edit]

SafeFlame (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Trademark name for an unproven product using old technology. (That is to say: there's no evidence that they've actually produced the product they describe) See Oxyhydrogen#Production. Jergling (talk) 17:58, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 01:16, 18 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as un-notable commercial blurb. Xxanthippe (talk) 01:32, 18 November 2016 (UTC).[reply]
• Delete instead as I've only managed to find a few things, nothing explicitly better for a convincing article, best mentioned elsewhere. SwisterTwister talk 03:08, 18 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Fails WP:GNG. Preaky (talk) 01:37, 24 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.