The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:16, 14 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Said Namouh

[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This individual does not appear to be notable unto himself. None of the events seemed to have gotten any major coverage, either. —Ryulong (竜龙) 10:03, 15 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISJAMMMY☆★ 11:28, 15 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISJAMMMY☆★ 11:28, 15 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Terrorism-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISJAMMMY☆★ 11:28, 15 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep The sources already cited in the article are reliable, at least a couple are news stories specifically about the subject - and a GNews search shows more. PWilkinson (talk) 09:12, 19 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:04, 22 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

weak keep - are a few sources indicating notability.--BabbaQ (talk) 16:07, 26 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, →B music ian 22:17, 29 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails WP:PERP which requires "For perpetrators: 1) The victim of the crime is a renowned national or international figure, including, but not limited to, politicians or celebrities, or 2) The motivation for the crime or the execution of the crime is unusual—or has otherwise been considered noteworthy—such that it is a well-documented historic event. Generally, historic significance is indicated by sustained coverage of the event in reliable secondary sources which persists beyond contemporaneous news coverage and devotes significant attention to the individual's role." This guy was tried, convicted and sentenced, but there is nothing to indicate his case meets these (admittedly high) standards. --MelanieN (talk) 18:50, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ItsZippy ^{(talk • contributions)} 17:43, 6 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep In my opinion, WP:PERP should be interpreted as referring to ordinary crimes, and were designed to keep out routine coverage of routine murders and robberies, and to compensate for the heavy press coverage of these events. But political crimes, or things charged as political crimes, are political acts and should be judged accordingly, by whether they are notable as such. I consider terrorism cases political crimes, regardless of the country. It meets the ordinary BLP standards--there areetqwo events to discuss, though related. DGG ( talk ) 21:54, 6 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.