- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. North America1000 00:35, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Sam Ghans Foot Sport Agency (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:GNG Kleuske (talk) 20:16, 19 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ghana-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 00:43, 22 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 00:43, 22 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 00:43, 22 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. North America1000 12:37, 23 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone 12:43, 23 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - no evidence of notability. GiantSnowman 12:56, 23 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - the references don't even mention this agency. Also, its official website is just a Facebook page; probable candidate for speedy deletion. Spiderone 13:57, 23 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Fails WP:ORG. A minor agency at best, doesn't seem to represent any top level footballers. Fenix down (talk) 13:35, 24 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - no evidence of notability, the refs given do not mention the agency. Eldumpo (talk) 18:56, 24 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as literally an entire advertisement of only what the company would advertise to clients and investors, none of it actual substance and nor would it be with such blatant triviality. SwisterTwister talk 21:13, 25 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.