The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Spartaz Humbug! 05:56, 8 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Samuel Lustenberger[edit]

Samuel Lustenberger (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I can find no evidence of him having played for Lucerne, and his other club appearances are not enough to pass WP:ATHLETE. Due to the absence of significant coverage, he also fails WP:GNG Sir Sputnik (talk) 13:28, 30 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

That depends on if SC Cham is fully pro as well. If it is, he passes WP:FOOTYN, and should be kept. A quick look at the clubs article suggests that it isn't fully pro, but that's far from definitive. Sir Sputnik (talk) 14:20, 30 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
As the article's creator, can you provide a source for his appearances for Lucerne? I nominated this article because wasn't able to find any sources to support that he had played for Lucerne's first team. If he did, he obviously passes WP:ATHLETE. Sir Sputnik (talk) 22:04, 4 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
His profile, which was the basis for the creation of the article and showed notability, has been removed from Football.ch...I can find no other source. GiantSnowman 23:51, 4 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Given that the Swiss Football Association has retracted his profile, and there is no other source to support its contents, I think its safe to assume that the data it provided was not accurate. Since SC Cham play in the Third division, his league appearances aren't enough to pass WP:ATHLETE, and the cup appearance does not meet WP:FOOTYN. Sir Sputnik (talk) 03:22, 5 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Yep, you're right - no sources = no notability. Delete GiantSnowman 00:01, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.