The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Draftify. Fenix down (talk) 10:14, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Samuel Silvera[edit]

Samuel Silvera (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. Subject has not played in competitive match between two fully pro teams nor has he represented his nation as senior or Olympic level. Simione001 (talk) 10:07, 9 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Simione001 (talk) 10:09, 9 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Simione001 (talk) 10:09, 9 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Changed from keep to draftify following comments by GiantSnowman. Even though there is coverage, I can't defend that GNG is met at this point NFOOTY is technically not met since his first match with the professional team was against a semi-pro, all indicates that both will be met shortly. --Crystallizedcarbon (talk) 08:13, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 11:53, 9 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions.CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 11:54, 9 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I did miss the fact that the first match with his new team was against a semi-professional team, so I do agree that WP:NFOOTBALL is not met at the time. Still, I think that being honored as youth player of the year does provide some level of notability, I also found a few other sources that provide additional coverage. I think that keeping it until the match mentioned by Pharaoh of the Wizards probably makes sense. In the worst case it should be draftified or moved to the user space of the author. --Crystallizedcarbon (talk) 16:28, 9 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.