The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy deleted under CSD A7. lifebaka++ 23:41, 21 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Samuel Thomas Allen[edit]

Samuel Thomas Allen (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Apparent hoax. Two users have been back and forth editing this hoax article, changing facts when the "facts" they had introduced were proved wrong. No indication that this player has ever existed at any notable level of play. Speedy deletes and prods declined. (Do I smell a sock?) WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 19:55, 21 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Speedy delete Not notable even if it isn't a hoax. Enigma^msg 20:03, 21 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • I don't see where a speedy was declined. I tagged it. This should not have to wait for an AfD to be closed. Enigma^msg 20:07, 21 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    • True. My poor recollection. A prod was denied (the original article was prodded because a claim of notability was made, but it was pretty surely a hoax.) Other articles by the same author have been nominated for speedy. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 20:08, 21 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy Delete hoax or notRcurtis5 (talk) 22:03, 21 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.