The result was keep. Michig (talk) 07:18, 7 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable amateur soccer league. Fails WP:GNG, WP:ORG, and WP:NSPORT.
All references in the article seem to be primary sources that do not represent significant coverage from an independent and reliable source.
The league is not included in the list of leagues kept by Wikipedia:WikiProject Football to assist with assessing notability.
A Google News search produces one hit that's from a local blog which can't be used to establish notability. A Google News Archive search produces two articles. One appears to be a forum and the other is a local news source that doesn't constitute significant coverage, in my opinion (it's just about soccer in the US, the league is only mentioned in passing). In short, I haven't found a single article that represents significant coverage from an independent and reliable sources.
The only claim of importance I see (the only reason I didn't nominate for A7) is that many notable people have played in the league. Notable athletes have played in many amateur leagues but that doesn't make them notable by any part of WP:N.
On a side note, the author may call you a secret racist or leave an odd message on your talk page regarding his feelings about people who are gay, incest, drug and alcohol abuse, dyslexia, "muscular orgasms", and racism. So... good luck with that. OlYeller21Talktome 04:07, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
An organization is not notable merely because a notable person or event was associated with it.