- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Mkdw talk 23:24, 5 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Sangramsingh Thakur (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable actor, lacks significant coverage in independent, reliable sources. Provided sources are mere-mentions, does not meet WP:GNG. Provided filmography is of several short films of dubious notability, and most of the roles played in said films appear to be minor. The few roles which appear to not be minor are completely unreferenced; does not meet WP:NACTOR. The article was previously denied at AfC, only for the initial editor to move it to mainspace unilaterally. signed, Rosguill talk 22:51, 29 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 23:07, 29 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 23:07, 29 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. Fails GNG and/or NACTOR by a mile or so. TOOTOOSOON.∯WBGconverse
- Delete per nom; only trivial mentions Spiderone 09:28, 4 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom, notability not demonstrated. This would not have been accepted through AfC and has no place here. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 10:08, 4 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.