The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. – Juliancolton | ^Talk 02:11, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sarina Campanella[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Appears to be a non-notable individual; no evidence of notability in the article. CapitalSasha ~ talk 08:12, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: One of two similar WP:SPA articles on this person and her small business, in this case sourced only to her company website. That "(h)er illustrations and photography have reached local musicians" is not a claim to notability (as well as being unsubstantiated) and my searches are finding nothing better. Fails to establish WP:CREATIVE or WP:BASIC notability. (Possible CSD A7?) AllyD (talk) 18:02, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:30, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:30, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:30, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Per WP:GNG. Comatmebro User talk:Comatmebro 00:39, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete; WP:GNG, and frankly WP:NOTLINKEDIN. - Julietdeltalima (talk) 00:37, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.