- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Thanks everyone for participating. :) Please assume good faith with my decision. If you believe this article was deleted without good reason, please request undeletion at deletion request, not my talk page. Thank you. SarahStierch (talk) 03:48, 4 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Saru Jayaraman (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
basically promotional, same as her organization (adjacent afd) DGG ( talk ) 03:27, 27 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISJAMMMY☆★ 01:43, 28 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISJAMMMY☆★ 01:43, 28 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISJAMMMY☆★ 01:43, 28 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete If there is enough notability for an article, it would be better to start from scratch as this is irredeemably too promotional. --Randykitty (talk) 10:40, 28 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. No pass of WP:GNG. Xxanthippe (talk) 10:48, 29 December 2013 (UTC).[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.