The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
KEEP it's a company trying to get their name out. it's not spam, its information about the company. --tmiller2011 16:49, 24 March 2011 (UTC)
Comment I created the article as a stub, with sources. ahager1773 and ahagersbca (i'm guessing both are associated with the organization) added a lot of material that is promotional in nature. I would suggest just removing that material and going back to the sourced stub, instead of deleting the entire article. I've removed the material and what's left should work as an article. Night Gyr (talk/Oy) 17:20, 24 March 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Keep Clear claim of notability, google news archive search shows lots of mentions to certainly verify, couldn't immediately find a source which gives it extensive coverage to fully assert notability, but giving benefit of doubt that it's out there somewhere. --CutOffTies (talk) 21:35, 25 March 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.