The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 16:35, 28 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sayabito[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence of notability. The only sources cited are two pages on what is described as "official website of Sayabito". Searches have produced entries on various listing sites, fansites, etc, but nothing substantial in reliable independent sources. JamesBWatson (talk) 14:10, 20 November 2012 (UTC) JamesBWatson (talk) 14:10, 20 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:32, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Anime and manga-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:32, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per JamesBWatson. Admittedly, I can't search for sources in Japanese though. Sven Manguard Wha? 20:19, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Not seeing sufficient third-party sourcing or in-depth coverage to demonstrate notability or justify a self-standing article. --DAJF (talk) 06:13, 22 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - not enough coverage in reliable sources. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 11:54, 22 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Delete - Blatant fanpage. Series has next to no impact on Japanese popular culture other than in niche subculture. Jun Kayama 01:34, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.