The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) –Davey2010 • (talk) 17:15, 31 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sayuri Fujita[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:BIO and WP:ENT. TV personality. Clearly not notable. scope_creep talk 19:56, 23 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep @Scope creep:This person has even gained some coverage in Chinese sources. ([1][2][3]) WP:ENT is irrelevant, since she appears to meet WP:BASIC. In my own view, WP:ENT C2 might be met.--180.172.239.231 (talk) 14:39, 24 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:05, 25 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Korea-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:05, 25 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:06, 25 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:06, 25 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. In addition to the Korean sources in the article, plus the Chinese ones shown above, there are also Japanese sources as well: [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10], [11],[12], etc. Here are even some English sources: [13], [14], etc. Clearly passes WP:GNG. Michitaro (talk) 19:35, 25 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.