The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Schedule. I didn't find a strong argument for deleting under the redirect, we generally reserve that for deeply problematic content j⚛e deckertalk 16:13, 28 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Schedule (resource)[edit]

Schedule (resource) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I would suggest to merge but the page doesn't contain any info that's not already under a multitude of pages including https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schedule_(workplace), https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schedule, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roster. Its only reference is the homepage of a random software company. U2fanboi (talk) 10:01, 8 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Here is yet another page with much the same info https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schedule_(project_management)U2fanboi (talk) 12:39, 8 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Management-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:07, 8 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, j⚛e deckertalk 23:13, 17 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.